Overclocking has the potential to damage/destroy components. Overclock at your own risk. Just because my settings didn’t blow up my machine, doesn’t mean they won’t blow up yours. The writeup below is subject to error and inaccuracy. If your machine dies, your house burns down, or you inadvertantly cause a chain reaction of events resulting in a nuclear power plant exploding due to something you read here, I disclaim all responsibility.
With that out of the way… the M4A785-M isn’t the newest of boards, and pairing it with one of the best AMD processors might seem a little puzzling. Here’s why it was chosen anyway…
- It’s cheap (under $100).
- It supports DDR2 RAM.
The fact of the matter is, I had perfectly good DDR2 RAM that wasn’t being used, and one of the newer AM3 boards just didn’t make sense. Therefore, I needed an AM2/AM2+ motherboard. Even though the X6 is an AM3 processor, it’s backwards compatible with AM2/AM2+ motherboards, proving the board supports it physically as well as through a BIOS update.
- The M4A785-M is a budget board. Budget boards and high-end processors often *barely* manage. Adding overclocking to the mix has the potential to spell trouble (heck, budget boards often have difficulty dealing with overclocked low-end chips).
- While it supports the X6 through a BIOS update, this motherboard obviously wasn’t originally designed with the 6-core in mind.
- It supports processors with a maximum of 125W (which most of the current X6’s are). Again, adding overclocking potentially pushes the limit. Note that there are other boards that support 140W processors (the ASUS M3A78-EM being an example of an older DDR2 motherboard that supports the 140W processors). It would be reasonable to assume that a 140W-supporting variant would be better suited to the task.
- 4+1 phase power design. I suppose it could be worse (Gigabyte has a DDR2 motherboard supporting the X6 with only 3+1), but there are AM3 boards out there with 8+2 phase.
- El-cheapo heatsinks. The northbridge heatsink is actually sized very well. However, the southbridge heatsink is as tiny as possible, and there’s no heatsink on the MOSFETs.
Despite these downsides, motherboard options in the DDR2 realm are slim, and this was the best motherboard locally available.
However, the reasons above are largely why the overclock was done at STOCK voltages. Overclocking adds a bit of heat and power consumption. Overvolting increases the heat/power-consumption substantially and I’d be begging for trouble doing it (I wouldn’t expect the board to last more than a year assuming it survived the overvolting process on this processor to begin with).
Hence, stock voltage results only.
Before throwing the motherboard in the case, I pulled the northbridge & southbridge heatsinks, and scraped off the old thermal interface junk. It’s silver stuff on the northbridge (similar to the AMD heatsink thermal interface pad), and the gross pink thermal pad on the southbridge. Once those were off, I replaced it with an extremely tiny amount of Arctic Silver.
If you replace the thermal pad with thermal paste, I’d recommend using a NON-CONDUCTIVE paste. The dies on the north/southbridge are so tiny that it would be easy to use too much, and if you conductive stuff you might kill the board.
I also used Arctic Silver on the stock AMD CPU heatsink. The included heatsink is actually pretty decent (heatpipes and everything), but the default thermal pad was too thick for my liking.
The motherboard’s a standard ATX size – if you’re using a medium-sized case, you’ll probably have to yank out your hard drives while you install it.
In terms of layout, the board’s pretty good. The one exception is that the 24-pin power connector hugs the IDE connector – this won’t matter if you’re using SATA, but if you’ve got an IDE drive, getting the cable in will be a little tight.
First, the board needed a BIOS update to support the processor. It detected it as an “Unknown Processor” and gave an error message about a CPU not being installed, although it still let me into the BIOS where I could change options and pop into the ASUS Bios Updater.
The BIOS included was version 702. The current X6’s require at least version 906. I used another computer to download the new ROM onto a USB memory stick, popped it in the M4A785-M, and let it flash. After a restart, things were looking good.
I did some quick testing at stock setttings. Note that I had close to the bare minimum attached to this thing, aside from a pile of fans. 1 hard drive, 1 dvd-rw drive, 2 sticks of DDR2-800 RAM, and that’s it. I was using the onboard video and had nothing else but a keyboard/mouse plugged in.
At idle (Windows 7), the system was using 84 watts at idle (measured from the power outlet), and 172 watts at load (running Prime 95). An average power supply should be able to handle this thing if you’re using onboard video.
While Prime was running, I touched the heatsinks. The CPU heatsink was relatively cool. The northbridge was cool (although the RAM cooler was giving it some airflow), but the southbridge was extremely hot. After about 5-10 seconds I had to pull my finger off to keep from cooking my skin. Immediately after shutoff, I felt the MOSFETs and they were hot.
Here’s the concern…
Southbridge – the heatsink is just too thin and tiny. Regular case airflow just doesn’t cut it. The thing’s screaming hot at stock, under load, with good case airflow. I’d hate to think what it would feel like in a stuffy (HTPC) case.
MOSFETs – the CPU fan passes some air over this region, but if you have the silent fan control enabled in the BIOS, at low CPU temps you’re not getting airflow.
I wouldn’t dare to overclock under these conditions. Overclock + a hot day could easily mean motherboard death.
My fixes were as follows:
Southbridge – I used zip ties to hang an 80mm fan over the location (which you can see in the picture), just to get some directed airflow. It worked very well.
MOSFETs – I turned off the setting for the silent fan in the BIOS so that it ran at full-speed all the time for maximum airflow in the area. I also used a dremel on the computer case to cut out the “grill” for the rear exhaust fan, so that the rear fan would pull more air over that general region (and increase total case air flow). This had a helpful effect – the MOSFETs still got very warm, but not as hot as before.
It’s pretty clear that the M4A785-M is marginal at best when it comes to cooling and the ability to deal with heat. I have a RAM cooler, rear exhaust fan, and 80mm fan over the southbridge added to the setup just to keep things comfortable temperature-wise at stock. I would have been very hesitant to risk overclocking without having dealt with the southbridge and MOSFET temps.
Now we get to the good stuff.
For all it’s flaws, the M4A785-M has a very capable BIOS for overclocking. My last post was about a terrible Intel-based ASUS. This one’s so nice it feels like the old (awesome) ASUS is back in town again. There are some flaws in the way things are worded in the BIOS, but the options are there and are plentiful.
For those new to the AMD side of things (but not new to overclocking processors), here’s a quick crash course on this motherboard….
CPU/HT reference clock – this is the base frequency that all your other stuff is multiplied against. It’s like the Intel FSB, but better (because more things are detached by way of adjustable multiplier).
Processor Frequency Multiplier – you already know what this does. This multiplied by the reference clock = CPU speed.
CPB Control – aka “Core Performance Boost”. This is the “Turbo” function to boost the multiplier of cores when they’re not all in use (single-threaded tasks). You can adjust the multiplier used for this if desired. I disabled it for overclocking because of a couple issues I’ll mention, as well as the difficulty involved in testing each core individually when turbo’d.
CPU/NB Frequency – This multiplier determines your Northbridge frequency (again, multiplied by your reference clock). The default works out to be 2000Mhz. It’s possible to get a speed improvement by bringing this up, although you’re going to hit a wall without increasing the voltage.
HT Link Speed – This is the “HyperTransport” speed. The default is 2000Mhz. For some reason they list a frequency instead of a multiplier. Note that overclocking this generally has almost no effect on your total system speed, and can even result in a DECREASE in speed. Overclocking it can also cause instability. Therefore, try to keep this thing around the stock frequency of 2000Mhz. The frequency listed is what it would be at a STOCK reference clock of 200Mhz. Therefore, when you increase the reference clock, you must DECREASE this setting to keep the actual result near 2000Mhz.
Memory Clock Mode / Memclock value – This is poorly written just like the HT Link Speed. The frequency shown here (when set to manual) is the frequency the RAM will run at when running the STOCK reference clock of 200Mhz. The math you have to do here is nothing short of a nightmare. When overclocking, it’s generally easiest to set this to 200Mhz (which is actually a 1:1 ratio, and would be DDR2-400 speeds at 200Mhz). Once you’ve finished with your overclocking, start increasing this setting (which will change ratios) until you get near your desired RAM speed.
Advanced Clock Calibration – Apparently this helped the original Phenom processors obtain higher stable overclocks utilizing the southbridge somehow. I’ve read mixed things on this, but from the sounds of it, this probably doesn’t benefit Phenom II’s a whole lot, and could cause instability. I have it disabled, but you could try both and see which nets you better results.
There’s plenty more I could go into, but this should be enough for now. In any case, the settings I ended up with were as follows:
CPU/HT Reference Clock (Mhz): 250
PCIE OverClocking: Manual (100)
Processor Frequency Multiplier: x 14.0
CPB Control: Disabled
CPU/NB Frequency: 8.00x (works out to 2000Mhz – later increased a notch)
HT Link Speed: 1600Mhz (works out to 2000Mhz)
Memclock Value: 333Mhz (works out to DDR2-832 if I remember right)
C1E Support: Enabled
Advanced Clock Calibration: Disabled
This resulted in a 3.5Ghz machine – a 700Mhz improvement over the stock 2.8Ghz. However, turbo is off (which by default gives 3.3Ghz on single-threaded tasks), so this isn’t a huge improvement for single-threaded stuff. However, everything was left at stock voltage.
Incidentally, I tried a base clock of 260, but it failed Prime95. It’s possible I could have squeezed a little more out of this by trying 255/etc, but since 250 allows me to maintain the stock 2000Mhz HT (at the poorly named “1600Mhz” setting), I left it there.
Most of the other stuff was left at default values. Note that I used C1E to help the processor cool down periodically for the types of tasks I do – you may want to disable it to try pushing higher clocks.
Important note! It’s been said in numerous places that your NB frequency MUST be equal to or higher than your HT frequency (never lower). Be careful of your settings when changing things around.
Finally, use the AMD Overdrive Utility and CPU-Z to see what each BIOS change actually results in setting-wise. Focus on the CPU frequency, NorthBridge frequency, HT Frequency, and RAM frequency. Make changes a little at a time – because the ASUS bios is a little poor when it comes to being clear about what each setting does/changes (listing frequencies when they should list multipliers for example), tiny changes erring on the side of caution is the best way to go.
I have never seen oddities like the ones I experienced here.
First, Memtest86+. Using the latest version I had (4.10), it never detected the actual RAM speed. It always used whatever the BIOS (incorrectly) reported based on the setting chosen. So when overclocked, it would say DDR2 667, even though the RAM was running at DDR2 832 when overclocked.
Next, the AMD Overdrive Utility, and CPU-Z. Initially, I had CPB (the “turbo boost”) setting enabled in the BIOS. However, no matter what frequencies I chose, AMD Overdrive kept claiming that I was running at stock (2.8Ghz), while CPU-Z showed my chosen frequency (3.5Ghz for example). They matched up everywhere else. Since I didn’t want to benchmark to see which was telling the truth (and didn’t want turbo boost limiting my overclock), I just disabled the CPB setting in the BIOS. They also mismatched when I’d manually choose a Processor Frequency Multiplier above 14.0 (basically if I chose the “turbo boost” multipliers), which is why I stuck with the 14.0 and just moved up the base clock.
At the settings listed above, I’m at 3.5Ghz. Prime is stable.
For the CPU temp, I’m looking at 19 degrees at idle (it’s cold in the house right now), and 42 degrees at load.
System power consumption (using onboard graphics) measured from the wall is 76 watts at idle, 202 watts at load.
All in all, the ASUS M4A785-M is a pretty decent motherboard in terms of capabilities. My overclocked results are in line with what most people seem to be able to achieve at stock voltages on the default air cooler. I’m sure that if I dared to up the voltage I could hit close to 4Ghz, but there’s no telling if the motherboard would actually survive for very long.
What I liked:
- Excellent overclocking options and a multitude of settings.
- The motherboard actually POSTed with the X6 before the BIOS update, allowing me to update the BIOS (some old BIOS’s used to require you to use a *recognized* CPU to even POST).
- Easy, stable overclock.
- Allowed me to use my DDR2 RAM, and you can set a 1:1 multiplier through the “200Mhz” option, which means even if you had ultra-slow DDR2 533 RAM, your memory would be able to run within spec at base clocks of up to ~266Mhz.
- Quite cheap. At under $100, it easily out-does every single Intel motherboard I’ve ever bought for under $100 in terms of options, features, and overclockability.
What I disliked:
- Southbridge cooling is marginal. No heatsink on the MOSFETs.
- Only 4+1 phase power design makes me leery.
- Some BIOS settings named incorrectly (showing HT and RAM as frequencies, even though they’re multipliers).
Would I recommend this board to others?
If you’re running a 2/3/4-core, and want to use DDR2, then yes.
If you’re running a 6-core and want to use DDR2, then only if you’re willing to: (1) refrain from cranking up the voltage for crazy overclocks; (2) add cooling.
UPDATE: I’ve since put this thing in an Antec 300 case, using a Noctua NH-U12P CPU cooler. There’s an intake fan, side fan, rear exhaust and top exhaust fan. I also JB-Welded a tiny tall heatsink to the southbridge to give it more access to air. Mosfets and Southbridge are both extremely cool now, so I have slightly upped the voltage to get a few more Mhz (still under the 4Ghz mark). Because the components are so cool, I’m not as concerned about the motherboard blowing up when overvolted a little, although I still wouldn’t go crazy. I’ll of course update again if the thing explodes anyway.
If you’re running a 6-core and DONT have extra fans lying around, you’re better off buying an AM3 board and just spending money on the DDR3 RAM – it’ll probably cost just as much as it would for you to buy a bunch of cooling and add it to this board.
If you’re determined to overclock towards the 4Ghz mark, don’t buy this board. Get an AM3 with good heatsinks all around, and a more capable phase power design.