<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: The best H.264 / x264 settings for Handbrake</title> <atom:link href="http://mattgadient.com/2009/09/12/the-best-h-264-x264-settings-for-handbrake/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://mattgadient.com/2009/09/12/the-best-h-264-x264-settings-for-handbrake/</link> <description>Informational blogging by Matthew Gadient.</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 23:04:33 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: daniel paun</title><link>http://mattgadient.com/2009/09/12/the-best-h-264-x264-settings-for-handbrake/#comment-5486</link> <dc:creator>daniel paun</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 17:36:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://mattgadient.com/?p=501#comment-5486</guid> <description>I read all u guys says here but my sample (using Handbreak) is still bluryy. See the see differences...
source: http://img12.imageshack.us/img12/9383/sources.png
sample: http://img401.imageshack.us/img401/9610/sampleyn.png</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read all u guys says here but my sample (using Handbreak) is still bluryy. See the see differences&#8230;<br
/> source: <a
href="http://img12.imageshack.us/img12/9383/sources.png" rel="nofollow">http://img12.imageshack.us/img12/9383/sources.png</a><br
/> sample: <a
href="http://img401.imageshack.us/img401/9610/sampleyn.png" rel="nofollow">http://img401.imageshack.us/img401/9610/sampleyn.png</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: my_handbrake_preset</title><link>http://mattgadient.com/2009/09/12/the-best-h-264-x264-settings-for-handbrake/#comment-5475</link> <dc:creator>my_handbrake_preset</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 01:50:16 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://mattgadient.com/?p=501#comment-5475</guid> <description>Min. RF should be 18 never go lower (no gain in quality and size could be higher than the source!). RF 20 work perfectly in most case. 21 is good, 22 is average, don&#039;t go higher at the same video size.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Min. RF should be 18 never go lower (no gain in quality and size could be higher than the source!). RF 20 work perfectly in most case. 21 is good, 22 is average, don&#8217;t go higher at the same video size.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: my_handbrake_preset</title><link>http://mattgadient.com/2009/09/12/the-best-h-264-x264-settings-for-handbrake/#comment-5474</link> <dc:creator>my_handbrake_preset</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 01:46:48 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://mattgadient.com/?p=501#comment-5474</guid> <description>for most videos
rc-lookahead=50:b-adapt=2:subq=9:trellis=1:ref=4:bframes=4:direct=autofor fast movies (better for motion)
rc-lookahead=50:b-adapt=2:subq=9:trellis=1:ref=4:bframes=4:direct=auto:analyse=allfor sports (better for motion &amp; more sharp):
rc-lookahead=50:b-adapt=2:subq=9:trellis=1:ref=4:bframes=4:direct=auto:analyse=all:deblock=-1,0</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>for most videos<br
/> rc-lookahead=50:b-adapt=2:subq=9:trellis=1:ref=4:bframes=4:direct=auto</p><p>for fast movies (better for motion)<br
/> rc-lookahead=50:b-adapt=2:subq=9:trellis=1:ref=4:bframes=4:direct=auto:analyse=all</p><p>for sports (better for motion &amp; more sharp):<br
/> rc-lookahead=50:b-adapt=2:subq=9:trellis=1:ref=4:bframes=4:direct=auto:analyse=all:deblock=-1,0</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Bob</title><link>http://mattgadient.com/2009/09/12/the-best-h-264-x264-settings-for-handbrake/#comment-5466</link> <dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 06:03:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://mattgadient.com/?p=501#comment-5466</guid> <description>Can we expound on the best settings when &quot;neither time nor space is an issue&quot;?  I use Handbrake 0.9.5 to encode MKVs primarily from my DVDs.  If I want to produce a file that grows increasingly close to the same quality as the source material, what are the optimal Handbrake settings?I&#039;ve pored over the individual explanations of each x264 setting, but the settings are generally explained from the perspective of &quot;here&#039;s how to increase compression while maintaining quality&quot;.  What settings do I use if I want to limit compression?For example, would I choose more or less REF frames and B-frames?  Would I choose a higher or lower Motion Estimation?  Or, would I just turn most settings off and use a constant quality of RF=10?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can we expound on the best settings when &#8220;neither time nor space is an issue&#8221;?  I use Handbrake 0.9.5 to encode MKVs primarily from my DVDs.  If I want to produce a file that grows increasingly close to the same quality as the source material, what are the optimal Handbrake settings?</p><p>I&#8217;ve pored over the individual explanations of each x264 setting, but the settings are generally explained from the perspective of &#8220;here&#8217;s how to increase compression while maintaining quality&#8221;.  What settings do I use if I want to limit compression?</p><p>For example, would I choose more or less REF frames and B-frames?  Would I choose a higher or lower Motion Estimation?  Or, would I just turn most settings off and use a constant quality of RF=10?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Dave</title><link>http://mattgadient.com/2009/09/12/the-best-h-264-x264-settings-for-handbrake/#comment-5241</link> <dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 09:41:33 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://mattgadient.com/?p=501#comment-5241</guid> <description>Hey Jari - I appreciate your input on Handbrake settings.  Are you using the current version (0.9.5)?  I&#039;m looking for HD quality from an ISO image and was looking for the very best settings anyone has.  Neither space nor time is an issue.  Any other thoughts?  I appreciate it.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Jari &#8211; I appreciate your input on Handbrake settings.  Are you using the current version (0.9.5)?  I&#8217;m looking for HD quality from an ISO image and was looking for the very best settings anyone has.  Neither space nor time is an issue.  Any other thoughts?  I appreciate it.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Matt Gadient</title><link>http://mattgadient.com/2009/09/12/the-best-h-264-x264-settings-for-handbrake/#comment-5234</link> <dc:creator>Matt Gadient</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 12:00:08 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://mattgadient.com/?p=501#comment-5234</guid> <description>Dave:If HD space isn&#039;t an issue, I&#039;d be inclined to be conservative with the settings (maybe even leave most at default values), and just crank up the quality setting a fair bit (under &quot;constant quality&quot;).Few reasons for this - first, once you start getting into large file sizes (higher bit-rates), it starts to get hard to distinguish the copy from the source material. You don&#039;t need the fancy tricks the encoder pulls off, because it all just plain looks good. Second, once you&#039;re into high bit-rates, it becomes increasingly likely that a hardware player will start choking when subjected to things like a high reference frame setting. Third, if you&#039;ve already got a high bit-rate (high quality setting), you probably don&#039;t need the encoder taking bits from scenes it doesn&#039;t think need them as much and reallocating them to other areas - you might notice the degradation where it took them away, and at the same time not notice the quality increase where it actually put them.Regardless, play around a bit and do a few test samples. If you&#039;re not concerned about HD space, just keep cranking up the quality slider until you don&#039;t notice a difference from the source (and make sure the Roku handles it).</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave:</p><p>If HD space isn&#8217;t an issue, I&#8217;d be inclined to be conservative with the settings (maybe even leave most at default values), and just crank up the quality setting a fair bit (under &#8220;constant quality&#8221;).</p><p>Few reasons for this &#8211; first, once you start getting into large file sizes (higher bit-rates), it starts to get hard to distinguish the copy from the source material. You don&#8217;t need the fancy tricks the encoder pulls off, because it all just plain looks good. Second, once you&#8217;re into high bit-rates, it becomes increasingly likely that a hardware player will start choking when subjected to things like a high reference frame setting. Third, if you&#8217;ve already got a high bit-rate (high quality setting), you probably don&#8217;t need the encoder taking bits from scenes it doesn&#8217;t think need them as much and reallocating them to other areas &#8211; you might notice the degradation where it took them away, and at the same time not notice the quality increase where it actually put them.</p><p>Regardless, play around a bit and do a few test samples. If you&#8217;re not concerned about HD space, just keep cranking up the quality slider until you don&#8217;t notice a difference from the source (and make sure the Roku handles it).</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Dave</title><link>http://mattgadient.com/2009/09/12/the-best-h-264-x264-settings-for-handbrake/#comment-5233</link> <dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 10:00:09 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://mattgadient.com/?p=501#comment-5233</guid> <description>Hi Matt - I&#039;m looking for the very best video &amp; audio quality settings possible for streaming movies to my Roku player.  Don&#039;t care about HD space, it&#039;s cheap.  Any update/suggestions for the latest Handbrake 0.9.5?Thanks much</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Matt &#8211; I&#8217;m looking for the very best video &amp; audio quality settings possible for streaming movies to my Roku player.  Don&#8217;t care about HD space, it&#8217;s cheap.  Any update/suggestions for the latest Handbrake 0.9.5?</p><p>Thanks much</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jari666</title><link>http://mattgadient.com/2009/09/12/the-best-h-264-x264-settings-for-handbrake/#comment-5172</link> <dc:creator>Jari666</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2011 02:30:12 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://mattgadient.com/?p=501#comment-5172</guid> <description>Hey there
I&#039;ve been using Handbrake for quite some time now and I&#039;m really pleased, although there are some things that certainly could need some improvements.Here are some good encoding settings I&#039;ve used for my really small rips. These rips are re-compressions of 720p x264 mid-quality rips which I downloaded. Each video is roughly 41min long and I&#039;ve used a size of 450mb which gives perfect quality, although the source itself isn&#039;t perfectly clean. 450mb / 41min is approximately 1500kbit/s, that&#039;s 30% of the size used in normal 720p rips found on the internet.http://tinyurl.com/3qyrywvMovies like The King&#039;s Speech look great with even less size. I got an 852kbit/s rip with 3 ref frames, me=hex, subme=7 and fast-pskip=1, but it looks perfect. Using higher settings should allow even lower bitrates, I think around 700kbit/s for low-motion movies like The King&#039;s Speech.If the link isn&#039;t working:Reference frames: 9
B-Frames: 12
CABAC: 1
8x8 Transform: 1
Weighted P-Frames: 1
Pyramidal B-Frames: Default (Normal)Adaptive B-Frames: Optimal
Adaptive Direct Mode: Automatic
Motion Estimation Method: Uneven Multi-Hexagon
Subpixel ME &amp; Mode Decision: 10: QPRD in all frames (requires trellis: always)
Motion Estimation Range: 64Adaptive Quantization Strength: 0.6
Psychovisual Rate Distortion: 1 (Default)
Psychovisual Trellis: 0Partition Type: All
Trellis: AlwaysDeblocking: A: -3 B: -2 (depends on source and preference. I like less blurred and a bit more noisy pictures)Regards, Jari666</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey there<br
/> I&#8217;ve been using Handbrake for quite some time now and I&#8217;m really pleased, although there are some things that certainly could need some improvements.</p><p>Here are some good encoding settings I&#8217;ve used for my really small rips. These rips are re-compressions of 720p x264 mid-quality rips which I downloaded. Each video is roughly 41min long and I&#8217;ve used a size of 450mb which gives perfect quality, although the source itself isn&#8217;t perfectly clean. 450mb / 41min is approximately 1500kbit/s, that&#8217;s 30% of the size used in normal 720p rips found on the internet.</p><p><a
href="http://tinyurl.com/3qyrywv" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/3qyrywv</a></p><p>Movies like The King&#8217;s Speech look great with even less size. I got an 852kbit/s rip with 3 ref frames, me=hex, subme=7 and fast-pskip=1, but it looks perfect. Using higher settings should allow even lower bitrates, I think around 700kbit/s for low-motion movies like The King&#8217;s Speech.</p><p>If the link isn&#8217;t working:</p><p>Reference frames: 9<br
/> B-Frames: 12<br
/> CABAC: 1<br
/> 8&#215;8 Transform: 1<br
/> Weighted P-Frames: 1<br
/> Pyramidal B-Frames: Default (Normal)</p><p>Adaptive B-Frames: Optimal<br
/> Adaptive Direct Mode: Automatic<br
/> Motion Estimation Method: Uneven Multi-Hexagon<br
/> Subpixel ME &amp; Mode Decision: 10: QPRD in all frames (requires trellis: always)<br
/> Motion Estimation Range: 64</p><p>Adaptive Quantization Strength: 0.6<br
/> Psychovisual Rate Distortion: 1 (Default)<br
/> Psychovisual Trellis: 0</p><p>Partition Type: All<br
/> Trellis: Always</p><p>Deblocking: A: -3 B: -2 (depends on source and preference. I like less blurred and a bit more noisy pictures)</p><p>Regards, Jari666</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Dave</title><link>http://mattgadient.com/2009/09/12/the-best-h-264-x264-settings-for-handbrake/#comment-5153</link> <dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 10:12:29 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://mattgadient.com/?p=501#comment-5153</guid> <description>Any experience with newest Handbrake 0.9.5?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any experience with newest Handbrake 0.9.5?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Anonymous</title><link>http://mattgadient.com/2009/09/12/the-best-h-264-x264-settings-for-handbrake/#comment-4832</link> <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 07 May 2011 08:53:13 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://mattgadient.com/?p=501#comment-4832</guid> <description>will this setting work for a 4.5 gb file and will the quality be like the 700mb .avi rips?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>will this setting work for a 4.5 gb file and will the quality be like the 700mb .avi rips?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: mattgadient.com @ 2012-02-07 22:10:31 -->
